We already have the tech, in multiple forms. First, tagging: ASACP/RTA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_Sites_Advocating_Child_Protection https://e

We already have the tech, in multiple forms. First, tagging: ASACP/RTA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_Sites_Advocating_Child_Protection https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_Sites_Advocatin... PICS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platform_for_Internet_Content_Selection https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platform_for_Internet_Content_... POWDER https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protocol_for_Web_Description_Resources https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protocol_for_Web_Description_R... Second, all ISPs could offer in their basic service something like DNS4EU modes, just like they offered email and web space decades ago (optional, nobody was forced to use them). DNS4EU https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNS4EU#Public_resolver https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNS4EU#Public_resolver Parents would only need to configure the account to "child". Laws could force companies to properly tag their pages and sites. And privacy would be preserved. Instead we have to keep on fighting the Crypto Wars. The childs are just a decoy, the target is destroying basic rights. Clipper chip war, eg. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip#Backlash https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip#Backlash