5 ms·
I use custom GPTs for interviewing me about requirements then producing a spec (https://chatgpt.com/g/g-69724a25850c8191a6f16a519b5ae055-software-spec-writer ht
by ravroid 7mo ago
I use custom GPTs for interviewing me about requirements then producing a spec (https://chatgpt.com/g/g-69724a25850c8191a6f16a519b5ae055-software-spec-writer https://chatgpt.com/g/g-69724a25850c8191a6f16a519b5ae055-sof...).
I use another GPT to turn that spec into a development plan for Codex that I include in AGENTS.md. (https://chatgpt.com/g/g-698a6ee58aec8191ba1e3b520b13b5e7-development-planner https://chatgpt.com/g/g-698a6ee58aec8191ba1e3b520b13b5e7-dev...)
I'm curious what advantages this product offers vs. using a prompt?
- enha 7mo agoGreat question, @ravroid. Custom GPTs are fantastic for general workflows, but IdeaForge is built for a more focused 'one-shot' success rate. Here’s why I think it’s worth a try over a generic prompt/GPT: Guided Extraction vs. Open Chat: Custom GPTs can sometimes drift or get 'lazy.' IdeaForge uses a specific Socratic interview logic designed to pull out the 'unknown unknowns' (like edge cases and data relationships) that users often forget to prompt. Optimized for Codex Context: The output isn't just a summary; it’s a structured specification specifically formatted to minimize hallucinations when pasted into Cursor or Codex. Zero Context Switching: Instead of jumping between an 'interview GPT' and a 'dev plan GPT,' IdeaForge handles the entire pipeline in one specialized UI, ensuring the logic remains consistent from idea to spec. Lower Barrier: No ChatGPT Plus subscription required for your end-users to get high-quality technical specs. I'd love for you to run one of your existing ideas through IdeaForge and let me know if the resulting MD is more 'executable' than your current workflow