9 ms·
It’s not just a copy. It’s a caricature of a copy with a plenty of nonsense in it: typos and weird “text”, broken arrows, etc. Even a cursory look gives a feeli
by pointlessone 7mo ago
It’s not just a copy. It’s a caricature of a copy with a plenty of nonsense in it: typos and weird “text”, broken arrows, etc. Even a cursory look gives a feeling that something’s fishy.
- toong 7mo ago"Legal reviewed it and did not flag any issues!"
- kuhaku22 7mo agoThis is the same Microsoft that promised to indemnify any of its customers sued over copyright lawsuits as a result of using its AIs. [0] So I'm sure legal reviewed it the same way, saying "Yep, our war chest is still ample". [0]: https://www.reuters.com/technology/microsoft-defend-customers-ai-copyright-challenges-2023-09-07/ https://www.reuters.com/technology/microsoft-defend-customer...
- tharos47 7mo agoWeird text was already deemed acceptable by microsoft in their documentation as they machine translated most screenshots instead of recreating them in different locales, leading to the same problems as this image.