6 ms·
My read is that it's immoral because it's a surveillance hijack without the knowledge of the users, as opposed to an opt-in.
by chrisrogers 7mo ago
My read is that it's immoral because it's a surveillance hijack without the knowledge of the users, as opposed to an opt-in.
- whattheheckheck 7mo agoAnd its not just opt in for the camera owner/licensor it should be explicitly optin for anyone who gets recorded
- loeg 7mo agoIn the US, you don't have an expectation of privacy in public places.
- hackable_sand 7mo agoI'm in the US. I have an expectation of privacy in public places.
- loeg 7mo agoI suppose you can expect whatever you want, but the law is not on your side.