If you think about it, it makes sense. Say what you want about LLM-assisted software development, the chances are high that it will stay, meaning a non-trivial

If you think about it, it makes sense. Say what you want about LLM-assisted software development, the chances are high that it will stay, meaning a non-trivial part of code will be written by an LLM. So is it better to have - git commit (mostly only code) - magic or blackblock (meaning back and forth by developer with LLM, before commit) - git commit (mostly only code) ... (rinse and repeat) or - git commit (prompt and/or code) - git commit (prompt and/or code) ... (rinse and repeat) Obviously for that to work the LLM output has to be deterministic and a commit chain has to be pinpointed to a specific weight blob.