30 ms·
It's a fine line that's been drawn, but this ruling says that AI can't own a copyright itself, not that AI output is inherently ineligible for copyright protect
by mikehearn 7mo ago
It's a fine line that's been drawn, but this ruling says that AI can't own a copyright itself, not that AI output is inherently ineligible for copyright protection or automatically public domain. A human can still own the output from an LLM.
- budududuroiu 7mo ago> A human can still own the output from an LLM. It specifically highlights human authorship, not ownership