12 ms·
Good that we have the arbitrator of what "real open source" is and isn't over here.
by kkzz99 7mo ago
Good that we have the arbitrator of what "real open source" is and isn't over here.
- yellowapple 7mo ago“Open source” is indeed an objective standard with actual criteria, and not just vibes. Luckily, it seems previous Qwen models did get open-sourced in the actual sense, so this one probably will be, too.
- kkzz99 7mo agoIts one NGO trying to dictate what "open source" is and btw. according to that definition, Qwen isn't open source.
- yellowapple 7mo ago> Its one NGO trying to dictate what "open source" is If you're referring to the OSI, they're the ones who invented the term “open source” in the first place, and are authoritative on what counts as “open source” and what doesn't. > and btw. according to that definition, Qwen isn't open source. Well yes, the lack of open-sourcing being the context of this thread :)