5 ms·

Man, you are really missing out of the biggest revolution of my life. This is the opinion of someone who has not tried to use Claude Code, in a brand new proje

Man, you are really missing out of the biggest revolution of my life. This is the opinion of someone who has not tried to use Claude Code, in a brand new project with full permissions enabled, and with a model from the last 3 months.

whynotminot 7mo ago
This is a fading but common sentiment on hacker news. There’s a lot of engineers who will refuse to wake up to the revolution happening in front of them. I get it. The denialism is a deeply human response.
- computerex 7mo ago
  It's insane! We are so far beyond gpt-3.5 and gpt-4. If you're not approaching Claude Code and other agentic coding agents with an open mind with the goal of deriving as much value from them as possible, you are missing out on super powers. On the flip side, anyone who believes you can create quality products with these tools without actually working hard is also deluded. My productivity is insane, what I can create in a long coding session is incredible, but I am working hard the whole time, reviewing outputs, devising GOOD integration/e2e tests to actually test the system, manually testing the whole time, keeping my eyes open for stereotypically bad model behaviors like creating fallbacks, deleting code to fulfill some objective. It's actually downright a pain in the ass and a very unpleasant experience working in this way. I remember the sheer flow state I used to get into when doing deep programming where you are so immersed in managing the states and modeling the system. The current way of programming for me doesn't seem to provide that with the models. So there are aspects of how I have programmed my whole life that I dearly miss. Hours used to fly past me without me being the wiser due to flow. Now that's no longer the case most of the times.
- falloutx 7mo ago
  Its only revolutionary if you think engineers were slow before or software was not being delivered fast enough. Its revolutionary for some people sure, but everyone is in a different situation, so one man's trash can be other man's treasure. Most people are treading both paths as automation threatens their livelihood and work they loved, also still not able to understand why would people pay to companies that are actively trying to convince your employer that your job is worthless. Even If I like this tech, I still dont want to support the companies who make it. Yet to pay a cent to these companies, still using the credits given to me by my employer.
  - whynotminot 7mo ago
    Of course software hasn’t been delivered fast enough. There is so so so much of the world that still needs high quality software.
    - gombosg 7mo ago
      I think there are four fundamental issues here for us... 1. There are actually less software jobs out there, with huge layoffs still going on, so software engineering as a profession doesn't seem to profit from AI. 2. The remaining engineers are expected by their employers to ship more. Even if they can manage that using AI, there will be higher pressure and higher stress on them, which makes their work less fulfilling, more prone to burnout etc. 3. Tied to the previous - this increases workism, measuring people, engineers by some output benchmark alone, treating them more like factory workers instead of expert, free-thinking individuals (often with higher education degrees). Which again degrades this profession as a whole. 3. Measuring developer productivity hasn't really been cracked before either, and still after AI, there is not a lot of real data proving that these tools actually make us more productive, whatever that may be. There is only anecdotal evidence: I did this in X time, when it would have taken me otherwise Y time - but at the same time it's well known that estimating software delivery timelines is next to impossible, meaning, the estimation of "Y" is probably flawed. So a lot of things going on apart from "the world will surely need more software".
      - whynotminot 7mo ago
        I don't see how anything you're saying is a response to what I said.
  - pickleRick243 7mo ago
    Do you have this same understanding for all the people whose livelihoods are threatened (or already extinct) due to the work of engineers?
    - falloutx 7mo ago
- bopbopbop7 7mo ago
  Where is all the amazing software and/or improvements in software quality that is supposed to be coming from this revolution? So far the only output is the "How I use AI blogs", AI marketing blogs, more CVEs, more outages, degraded software quality, and not much of shipping anything. Is there any examples of real products and not just anecdotes of "I'm 10x more productive!"?
  - whynotminot 7mo ago
    Sounds like a skill issue. I’ve seen it rapidly increase the speed of delivery in my shop.
    - deleted 7mo ago
      [deleted]
    - deleted 7mo ago
      [deleted]
    - deleted 7mo ago
      [deleted]
    - deleted 7mo ago
      [deleted]
    - osn9363739 7mo ago
      Why is it so hard to find examples?
      - whynotminot 7mo ago
        You’re asking to see my company’s code base? It’s not like with AI we’re making miraculous things you’ve never seen before. We’re shipping the same kinda stuff just much faster. I don’t know what you’re looking for. Code is code it’s just more and more being written by AI.
        osn9363739 7mo ago
notpachet 7mo ago
> in a brand new project Must be nice. Claude and Codex are still a waste of my time in complex legacy codebases.
- bigfishrunning 7mo ago
  Brand new projects have a way of turning into legacy codebases
- bornfreddy 7mo ago
  What are you talking about? Exploring and explaining the legacy codebases is where they shine, in my experience.
pletnes 7mo ago
Claude code is great at figuring out legacy code! I dont get the «for new systems only» idea, myself.
bigstrat2003 7mo ago
People have been saying "the models from (recent timeframe) are so much better than the old ones, they solve all the problems" for years now. Since GPT-4 if not earlier. Every single time, those goalposts have shifted as soon as the next model came out. With such an abysmal track record, it's not reasonable to expect people to believe that this time the tool actually has become good and that it's not just hype.
- Akranazon 7mo ago
  When is the last time someone said that, motivating you to try the latest model? If it was 6 or more month ago, my reply is that the sentiment expressed was partially incorrect in the past, but it is not incorrect now. If a conspiracy theorist is always wrong about a senior citizen being killed, that does not make the senior immortal.

whynotminot 7mo ago

This is a fading but common sentiment on hacker news. There’s a lot of engineers who will refuse to wake up to the revolution happening in front of them. I get it. The denialism is a deeply human response.

computerex 7mo ago
It's insane! We are so far beyond gpt-3.5 and gpt-4. If you're not approaching Claude Code and other agentic coding agents with an open mind with the goal of deriving as much value from them as possible, you are missing out on super powers. On the flip side, anyone who believes you can create quality products with these tools without actually working hard is also deluded. My productivity is insane, what I can create in a long coding session is incredible, but I am working hard the whole time, reviewing outputs, devising GOOD integration/e2e tests to actually test the system, manually testing the whole time, keeping my eyes open for stereotypically bad model behaviors like creating fallbacks, deleting code to fulfill some objective. It's actually downright a pain in the ass and a very unpleasant experience working in this way. I remember the sheer flow state I used to get into when doing deep programming where you are so immersed in managing the states and modeling the system. The current way of programming for me doesn't seem to provide that with the models. So there are aspects of how I have programmed my whole life that I dearly miss. Hours used to fly past me without me being the wiser due to flow. Now that's no longer the case most of the times.
falloutx 7mo ago
Its only revolutionary if you think engineers were slow before or software was not being delivered fast enough. Its revolutionary for some people sure, but everyone is in a different situation, so one man's trash can be other man's treasure. Most people are treading both paths as automation threatens their livelihood and work they loved, also still not able to understand why would people pay to companies that are actively trying to convince your employer that your job is worthless. Even If I like this tech, I still dont want to support the companies who make it. Yet to pay a cent to these companies, still using the credits given to me by my employer.
- whynotminot 7mo ago
  Of course software hasn’t been delivered fast enough. There is so so so much of the world that still needs high quality software.
  - gombosg 7mo ago
    I think there are four fundamental issues here for us... 1. There are actually less software jobs out there, with huge layoffs still going on, so software engineering as a profession doesn't seem to profit from AI. 2. The remaining engineers are expected by their employers to ship more. Even if they can manage that using AI, there will be higher pressure and higher stress on them, which makes their work less fulfilling, more prone to burnout etc. 3. Tied to the previous - this increases workism, measuring people, engineers by some output benchmark alone, treating them more like factory workers instead of expert, free-thinking individuals (often with higher education degrees). Which again degrades this profession as a whole. 3. Measuring developer productivity hasn't really been cracked before either, and still after AI, there is not a lot of real data proving that these tools actually make us more productive, whatever that may be. There is only anecdotal evidence: I did this in X time, when it would have taken me otherwise Y time - but at the same time it's well known that estimating software delivery timelines is next to impossible, meaning, the estimation of "Y" is probably flawed. So a lot of things going on apart from "the world will surely need more software".
    - whynotminot 7mo ago
      I don't see how anything you're saying is a response to what I said.
- pickleRick243 7mo ago
  Do you have this same understanding for all the people whose livelihoods are threatened (or already extinct) due to the work of engineers?
  - falloutx 7mo ago
bopbopbop7 7mo ago
Where is all the amazing software and/or improvements in software quality that is supposed to be coming from this revolution? So far the only output is the "How I use AI blogs", AI marketing blogs, more CVEs, more outages, degraded software quality, and not much of shipping anything. Is there any examples of real products and not just anecdotes of "I'm 10x more productive!"?
- whynotminot 7mo ago
  Sounds like a skill issue. I’ve seen it rapidly increase the speed of delivery in my shop.
  - deleted 7mo ago
    [deleted]
  - deleted 7mo ago
    [deleted]
  - deleted 7mo ago
    [deleted]
  - deleted 7mo ago
    [deleted]
  - osn9363739 7mo ago
    Why is it so hard to find examples?
    - whynotminot 7mo ago
      You’re asking to see my company’s code base? It’s not like with AI we’re making miraculous things you’ve never seen before. We’re shipping the same kinda stuff just much faster. I don’t know what you’re looking for. Code is code it’s just more and more being written by AI.
      - osn9363739 7mo ago

notpachet 7mo ago

> in a brand new project Must be nice. Claude and Codex are still a waste of my time in complex legacy codebases.

bigfishrunning 7mo ago
Brand new projects have a way of turning into legacy codebases
bornfreddy 7mo ago
What are you talking about? Exploring and explaining the legacy codebases is where they shine, in my experience.

pletnes 7mo ago

Claude code is great at figuring out legacy code! I dont get the «for new systems only» idea, myself.

bigstrat2003 7mo ago

People have been saying "the models from (recent timeframe) are so much better than the old ones, they solve all the problems" for years now. Since GPT-4 if not earlier. Every single time, those goalposts have shifted as soon as the next model came out. With such an abysmal track record, it's not reasonable to expect people to believe that this time the tool actually has become good and that it's not just hype.

Akranazon 7mo ago
When is the last time someone said that, motivating you to try the latest model? If it was 6 or more month ago, my reply is that the sentiment expressed was partially incorrect in the past, but it is not incorrect now. If a conspiracy theorist is always wrong about a senior citizen being killed, that does not make the senior immortal.