6 ms·
Anthropic mostly had an advantage in speed. It feels like with a 25% increase in speed with Codex 5.3, they are now losing that advantage as well.
by Robin_f 8mo ago
Anthropic mostly had an advantage in speed. It feels like with a 25% increase in speed with Codex 5.3, they are now losing that advantage as well.
- smith7018 8mo agoI just asked Opus 4.6 to debug a bug in my current changes and it went for 20 minutes before I interrupted it. Take that as you will.
- bgirard 8mo agoDoesn't feel like a useful data point without more context. For some hard bugs I'd be thrilled to wait 30 minutes for a fix, for a trivial CSS fix not so much. I've spent weeks+ of my career fix single bugs. Context is everything.
- smith7018 8mo agoSure, but I've never experienced a 20 minute wait with CC before. It was an architectural question but it would have taken a couple minutes with a definitive answer on 4.5.
- sejje 7mo ago> I've spent weeks+ of my career fix single bugs. Same, same. It's not a useful data point at all. bug: llm alignment timeframe to fix : probably never
- mrcwinn 8mo agoAs they point out in their blog post, 4.6 intentionally thinks longer, but you can adjust it from the CLI.