5 ms·
I think the naming schemes are quite arbitrary at this point. Going to 5 would come with massive expectations that wouldn't meet reality.
by trash_cat 7mo ago
I think the naming schemes are quite arbitrary at this point. Going to 5 would come with massive expectations that wouldn't meet reality.
- mrandish 7mo agoAfter the negative reactions to GPT 5, we may see model versioning that asymptotically approaches the next whole number without ever reaching it. "New for 2030: Claude 4.9.2!"
- esafak 7mo agoOr approaching a magic number like e (Metafont) or π (TeX).
- Squarex 7mo agothe standard used to be that major version means a new base model / full retrain... but now it is arbitrary i guess