4 ms·
This reads less like nutrition science and more like addiction engineering. The tobacco analogy isn’t rhetorical, it’s structural.
by fastThinking 8mo ago
This reads less like nutrition science and more like addiction engineering. The tobacco analogy isn’t rhetorical, it’s structural.
- Citizen_Lame 8mo agoWhy have people adopted ChatGPt lingo.
- grahamnorton39 8mo agoActually, sounds like it’s written entirely by an LLM, and so do their other comments
- fastThinking 8mo agoIf well-formed sentences now read as LLM output, that’s unfortunate. If you disagree with the point(s) I’m happy to discuss that instead.
- bruce343434 8mo agoBecause lots of people use it a lot, they subconsciously pick up on the language that surrounds them I.e. ai language
- fastThinking 8mo agoNo LLM here, just a habit from academic writing. The reason the tobacco analogy works for me is that both cases optimize around reinforcement, not outcomes.