... also some parts are Apache, and the wording around the AGPL bit is very weird: > ... licensed to use source code to create compiled versions ... Why's it

... also some parts are Apache, and the wording around the AGPL bit is very weird: > ... licensed to use source code to create compiled versions ... Why's it calling out compiling specifically? Are they trying to imply you can't modify/distribute/etc the source? Presumably that would be a "further restriction" per the AGPL and hence ignorable, but it's sloppy at best and misleading at worse, which isn't great for a license document...