Their first example [1] is a complete non-sequitur and I’m trying to comprehend how this passed human review and must assume it’s AI, which doesn’t bode well fo

Their first example [1] is a complete non-sequitur and I’m trying to comprehend how this passed human review and must assume it’s AI, which doesn’t bode well for the supposed usefulness of their system. [1] https://images.ctfassets.net/kftzwdyauwt9/2tMhL5Www2vA6I62DVpNgv/4923ef472351cdb3a87ff4130a83ed14/Mobile-Light.png?w=1200&q=70&fm=webp https://images.ctfassets.net/kftzwdyauwt9/2tMhL5Www2vA6I62DV... “What was ChatGPT Image Gen logged-in DAU for the last 30 days? Worked for 1m 22s > ChatGPT WAU on October 6, 2025 (rounded to nearest 100M): = 800M ChatGPT WAU on the last DevDay 2023 (Nov 6, 2023; rounded to nearest 100M): = 100M Mini comparison (using the rounded figures only): • Change: = +700M WAU • Multiple: = 8x higher on 2025-10-06 vs 2023-11-06 (WAU here is the standard ChatGPT WAU as-of the reporting date; I'm only sharing the values rounded to the nearest 100M, per your request.)”