6 ms·
Sounds very negative, but I can confirm - it's the truth unfortunately. I'm developing windows desktop apps since nearly 30 years now and tried mostly everythi
by irrlichthn 8mo ago
Sounds very negative, but I can confirm - it's the truth unfortunately.
I'm developing windows desktop apps since nearly 30 years now and tried mostly everything Microsoft has thrown at us - Win32 - WinForms - WPF - WinJS - WinRT - UWP - WinUI - MAUI - not sure if that was all - and Win32 always wins. Everything else is incredible broken and stops being supported in such a short time. It's a shame really.
- ruicraveiro 8mo agoI jumped the train when they crashed the Silverlight carriage.
- pjmlp 8mo agoIt is what happens when passionate advocates feel betrayed by all the mismanagement that has happened since Windows 8. I switched from someone that was kind found of WinRT, as what .NET 1.0 should have been, AOT compiled languages built on top of COM, improving the VB 6 experience, to someone burned out with the experience, back into Web development and distributed systems. However, Microsoft keeps talking as if everything was tiptop, and that angers me thus I keep track of how bad things still are, and spend time making others aware of the false promises. For example, I bet no one is aware that C++/WinRT is actually in maintenance, and the team responsible for killing C++/CX, is now having fun with Rust on windows-rs. Yet Microsoft talks about using C++ to develop WinUI applications, as if the tooling was at the same level as using C++ Builder or Qt/QtBuilder.
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]