6 ms·
I don't think I will ever be convince that someone has a better syntax for HTML. Markdown is not bad for writing a quick document. But authoring a whole webpage
by STHayden 14y ago
I don't think I will ever be convince that someone has a better syntax for HTML. Markdown is not bad for writing a quick document. But authoring a whole webpage nothing beats pure html. I'm still on the fence for CoffeeScript as well.
More power to you for trying.
- JimmyRuska 14y agoThis accepts all html tags and attributes so it can be used equivalently to html. Any command line program can be added as a parser.