7 ms·
this is probably a net negative as there are many very good scientists with not very strong English skills. the early years of LLMs (when they were good enough
by currymj 8mo ago
this is probably a net negative as there are many very good scientists with not very strong English skills.
the early years of LLMs (when they were good enough to correct grammar but not enough to generate entire slop papers) were an equalizer. we may end up here but it would be unfortunate.
- BlueTemplar 8mo agoBut then, assuming we are fine with this state of things with LLMs : why would it be upon them to submit in English, when instead reviewers and readers can themselves use a LLM translator to read the paper ?
- currymj 8mo agothis would be a good development. seems very far off.
- BlueTemplar 8mo agoHow is it far off if it's already used like this, just on the side of submitters ?