11 ms·

How is this news? A lot of airports in Europe had had this for years and even in England there were terminals within the major hubs where this was already the n

by Halan 8mo ago

How is this news? A lot of airports in Europe had had this for years and even in England there were terminals within the major hubs where this was already the norm

n4r9 8mo ago
Heathrow is by far the largest airport in the UK, with several times more flights per day than any other, and flights to a broader range of destinations. So it affects a lot more prospective fliers. I looked up European airports and found some mention that Rome and Milan also have this new equipment, but they're both still significantly smaller than Heathrow.
- Halan 8mo ago
  Gatwick already had it too, at least a part of it. The fact Heathrow got 30/40% more traffic than other airports in the same continent already having it doesn’t make the news worth all this noise.
  - n4r9 8mo ago
    Yes but Heathrow has around twice as many departures per day (edit after your edit:) than Gatwick. This is on BBC news. Heathrow is twice as busy as any other airport in the UK. It's the easiest major airport to reach from London (other than LCY which is not that "major"). I literally know people who are leaving from Heathrow this week and are affected by this. C'mon, it's newsworthy.
    - Halan 8mo ago
      Yeah and 50% more than Rome, but overall less than all airports already doing it in Europe. This news made front page out of two things: 1) English people do not know anything about continental Europe 2) Americans do not know anything about Europe
      - n4r9 8mo ago
        Oh okay, you're asking why is it on HN front page rather than more generally why is it newsworthy. That's a fair point. I suppose it's a big feat of logistics and engineering to manage a switchover at such a large airport with so many terminals
- deleted 8mo ago
  [deleted]
gpvos 8mo ago
Schiphol had this for a while (several years I think, I don't fly often), but they reversed it a couple of years ago because European regulators didn't agree for some reason, and now liquids are forbidden again (discussed elsewhere in thread). So this surprises me and is news to me.
lavezzi 8mo ago
Because Heathrow markets itself as a world class airport and they have been woefully behind the times with regards to updating their security tech

by Halan 8mo ago

How is this news? A lot of airports in Europe had had this for years and even in England there were terminals within the major hubs where this was already the norm

n4r9 8mo ago

Heathrow is by far the largest airport in the UK, with several times more flights per day than any other, and flights to a broader range of destinations. So it affects a lot more prospective fliers. I looked up European airports and found some mention that Rome and Milan also have this new equipment, but they're both still significantly smaller than Heathrow.

Halan 8mo ago
Gatwick already had it too, at least a part of it. The fact Heathrow got 30/40% more traffic than other airports in the same continent already having it doesn’t make the news worth all this noise.
- n4r9 8mo ago
  Yes but Heathrow has around twice as many departures per day (edit after your edit:) than Gatwick. This is on BBC news. Heathrow is twice as busy as any other airport in the UK. It's the easiest major airport to reach from London (other than LCY which is not that "major"). I literally know people who are leaving from Heathrow this week and are affected by this. C'mon, it's newsworthy.
  - Halan 8mo ago
    Yeah and 50% more than Rome, but overall less than all airports already doing it in Europe. This news made front page out of two things: 1) English people do not know anything about continental Europe 2) Americans do not know anything about Europe
    - n4r9 8mo ago
      Oh okay, you're asking why is it on HN front page rather than more generally why is it newsworthy. That's a fair point. I suppose it's a big feat of logistics and engineering to manage a switchover at such a large airport with so many terminals
deleted 8mo ago
[deleted]

gpvos 8mo ago

Schiphol had this for a while (several years I think, I don't fly often), but they reversed it a couple of years ago because European regulators didn't agree for some reason, and now liquids are forbidden again (discussed elsewhere in thread). So this surprises me and is news to me.

lavezzi 8mo ago

Because Heathrow markets itself as a world class airport and they have been woefully behind the times with regards to updating their security tech