5 ms·
Bad content reaching kids is not the issue. (Well, it is part of it…) The whole thing is bad. We don't give cigarettes to kids either.
by vlz 8mo ago
Bad content reaching kids is not the issue. (Well, it is part of it…) The whole thing is bad. We don't give cigarettes to kids either.
- krainboltgreene 8mo agoActually, we don't stop kids from buying cigarettes, we punish stores that sell cigarettes to kids and are caught! That's my entire point! You just made my argument for me!
- allan_s 8mo agoAnd the store does not use facial recognition and/or checking id to know if the potential buyer is a kid ? The only (huge) difference for me is the scale of the verification and how data are stored.
- krainboltgreene 8mo ago> And the store does not use facial recognition and/or checking id to know if the potential buyer is a kid? They can just not serve cigarettes. In addition I think it's also insane to compare cigarettes, which are purely negative, to free internet usage which is massively net positive.
- dotancohen 8mo agoDespite the headline, does this law actually punish the children if they are caught with social media accounts? Or is the burden on the social media providers?