5 ms·
This looks great. I've been using OpenWebUI for a while now and the weird licence and inability to just pay for branding has frustrated me. This looks like it'
by turblety 8mo ago
This looks great. I've been using OpenWebUI for a while now and the weird licence and inability to just pay for branding has frustrated me.
This looks like it's not only a better license, but also much better features.
- mythz 8mo agoYep Open WebUI's switch to a non OSS license to inhibit competitive forks [1], in their own words [2] ensures I'll never use them. Happy to develop an OSS alternative that does the opposite whose rewrite on extensibility enables community extensions can replace built-in components and extensions so it can easily be rebranded and extended with custom UI + Server features. The goal is for the core main.py to be a single file without requiring additional dependencies, anything that does can be loaded as an extension (i.e. just a folder with .py server and UI hooks). There's also a script + docs so you can mix n' match the single main.py file and repackage it which whatever extensions you want included [3]. [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/opensource/comments/1kfhkal/open_webui_is_no_longer_open_source/ https://www.reddit.com/r/opensource/comments/1kfhkal/open_we... [2] https://docs.openwebui.com/license/ https://docs.openwebui.com/license/ [3] https://llmspy.org/docs/deployment/custom-build https://llmspy.org/docs/deployment/custom-build