5 ms·
On the contrary, I hope vibe coding revives Linux desktop into a truly usable platform. e.g. Vibe coding defeats GNOME developers' main argument for endlessly
by neko-kai 8mo ago
On the contrary, I hope vibe coding revives Linux desktop into a truly usable platform.
e.g. Vibe coding defeats GNOME developers' main argument for endlessly deleting features and degrading user experience - that features are ostensibly "hard to maintain".
Well, LLMs are rapidly reducing development costs to 0.
The bottleneck for UI development is now testing, and here desktop Linux has advantage - Linux users have been trained like Pavlov's dogs to test and write detailed upstream bug reports, something Windows and macOS users just don't do.
- croes 8mo agoYou don't think the current prices of LLMs will stay? At some point the investors want to see profit.
- Cthulhu_ 8mo agoIs the maintenance due to code or due to people / politics / etc? LLMs won't change that. Also it's a formal system and process, "vibe" coding is anything but. Call me curmudgeony (?) but I don't think "vibe coding" should be a phrase used to describe LLM assisted software engineering in large / critical systems.
- rvz 8mo ago> On the contrary, I hope vibe coding revives Linux desktop into a truly usable platform. Oh sweet summer child. > Well, LLMs are rapidly reducing development costs to 0. And maintainance costs along with technical debt rapidly goes up.