7 ms·
I thought GP was arguing they were trying to find non-citizens on the voter rolls to intimidate them (which may be a misreading).
by cma256 8mo ago
I thought GP was arguing they were trying to find non-citizens on the voter rolls to intimidate them (which may be a misreading).
- jayd16 8mo agoThey'll claim they're doing that but intimidate citizens instead.
- cthalupa 8mo agoNo. There are not non-citizens on voter rolls. They want the rolls to get data on voters. When you ask yourself why the ultra-politicized DOJ (which isn't even the DHS...) from an administration that has explicitly called liberals the enemy is asking for voter rolls, it becomes pretty understandable why people might come to the conclusion that it is to suppress the people that have already explicitly been identified as targets.
- smsm42 8mo ago> There are not non-citizens on voter rolls. That is incorrect, there are actually non-citizens on voter rolls, especially in the states with automatic voter registration. Example: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/scotus-allows-virginia-remove-noncitizens-voter-rolls-election-attorney-general-paxton-and https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/scotus-al... Of course, actually voting would be a crime: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/611 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/611 but it doesn't stop everybody: https://www.daytondailynews.com/news/state-more-than-100-non-citizens-have-voted-ohio/kLDaZOPtJBvlx1JNEWt1DJ/ https://www.daytondailynews.com/news/state-more-than-100-non...
- cthalupa 8mo agoThank you. I stand corrected.