6 ms·

Do people actually take papers in "management science" seriously?

• abanana 8mo ago
  Yes, that's the problem, many do, and they swear by these oversimplified ideas and one-liners that litter the field of popular management books, fully believing it's all "scientific" and they'll laugh at you for questioning it. It's nuts.
  • graemep 8mo ago
    There is a difference between popular management books and academic publications. For example there is a long history of studies of the relationship between working hours and productivity which is one of the few things that challenges the idea that longer hours means more output.
    • abanana 8mo ago
      Yes, but the books generally take their ideas from the academic publications. And the replication problems, and general incentives around academic publishing, show that all too often, the academic publications in the social sciences are unfortunately no more rigorous than the populist books.
      • graemep 8mo ago
        That is true, but the popular books both simplify and cherry pick which makes it a whole to worse.
• malshe 8mo ago
  They do and there is nothing wrong with that. The papers published in this journal are peer-reviewed and go through multiple rounds of review. Also, note that Andrew King could carry out the replication because the data is publicly available.