It's slightly embarrassing the author proudly declaims "no LLMs were abused" when in fact an LLM gives a much more useful answer by focusing on the syntactic ve

It's slightly embarrassing the author proudly declaims "no LLMs were abused" when in fact an LLM gives a much more useful answer by focusing on the syntactic versus semantic distinction. The author essentially parrots back the "what" as opposed to the "why."