The site guidelines is supposed to be anything that a hacker finds interesting. This feels a bit like dumping the manual to a Toyota Camry without explanation.

The site guidelines is supposed to be anything that a hacker finds interesting. This feels a bit like dumping the manual to a Toyota Camry without explanation. It’s technical, but what’s interesting? Maybe there is interesting stuff in here - but I’d love to see submissions do some kind of analysis to justify it - like an appreciation of an example of well-run user documentation, or a highlighting a clear and concise explanation of how a particular subsystem works. These posts just rocket to the top of Hacker News with no discussion.