6 ms·
> But if it was there is currently no way for anyone to tell the difference. This is false. There are many human-legible signs, and there do exist fairly reli
by comp_throw7 8mo ago
> But if it was there is currently no way for anyone to tell the difference.
This is false. There are many human-legible signs, and there do exist fairly reliable AI detection services (like Pangram).
- threethirtytwo 8mo agoI've tested some of those services and they weren't very reliable.
- CamperBob2 8mo agoIf such a thing did exist, it would exist only until people started training models to hide from it. Negative feedback is the original "all you need."
- int_19h 8mo agoThere are no reliable AI detection services. At best they can reliably detect output from popular chatbots running with their default prompts. Beyond that reliability deteriorates rapidly so they either err on the side of many false positives, or on the side of many false negatives. There's already been several scandals where students were accused of AI use on the basis of these services and successfully fought back.