6 ms·

You really do not add much value to any conversation you're a part of. The reading comprehension just isn't there. It remains true, my views are gained from sub

You really do not add much value to any conversation you're a part of. The reading comprehension just isn't there. It remains true, my views are gained from submission to my faith. I recognize they're not my views. It's submission to our higher power. The difference is that you think your views are yours. But you're a moral relativist being manipulated. Blowing with the wind in society, you're a "cool guy". Anything goes. You wouldn't want to rock the boat on the latest thing coming out of your tribe, now would you. You might have to man up and be uncomfortable, taking an actual counter-cultural stand for once. Not happening Chris.

lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 8mo ago
For anyone who wants a term to refer to this seemingly nonsensical behavior: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
- BuckRogers 8mo ago
  Pathetic. You guys really don’t have anything to say, do you. Pure feelings, pure emotions.
  - lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 8mo ago
    This is just more of the same. These things you accuse others of are simply your own insecurities. Every single word, at least in these last two comments.
    - BuckRogers 8mo ago
      Who here has said anything of substance in response to anything I've said? Not you. You're not countering anything I said, offering no new information, not even offering a counterpoint to anything. Just pure ad hominins. Yes, it's absolutely pathetic and not uncommon anymore. You're just neffing and signaling that you dislike my position and views. Too bad. Talking about insecurity. That's the only "more of the same" going on here.
      - lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 8mo ago
        > Who here has said anything of substance in response to anything I've said? What have you written that is substantive? It appears your comments in this thread are all meta descriptions of themselves. That is what I refer to as a "psychological projection".
        BuckRogers 8mo ago
        I said more of substance here than you for sure. At least I had a point. You’re just attacking the messenger. Totally useless.
        lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 8mo ago
        > I said more of substance here than you for sure. At least I had a point. Your comments do not make any substantive points. One observation with regard to this is that, when asked for anything you've written in this thread that is substantive, you write only that it exists rather than offering said substance for review. > You’re just attacking the messenger. My comments are not about you but instead about the things you've posted and your seeming behavior while doing so. I have no quarrel with you.
        BuckRogers 8mo ago
        Wow, talk about projecting.

lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 8mo ago

For anyone who wants a term to refer to this seemingly nonsensical behavior: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

BuckRogers 8mo ago
Pathetic. You guys really don’t have anything to say, do you. Pure feelings, pure emotions.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 8mo ago
  This is just more of the same. These things you accuse others of are simply your own insecurities. Every single word, at least in these last two comments.
  - BuckRogers 8mo ago
    Who here has said anything of substance in response to anything I've said? Not you. You're not countering anything I said, offering no new information, not even offering a counterpoint to anything. Just pure ad hominins. Yes, it's absolutely pathetic and not uncommon anymore. You're just neffing and signaling that you dislike my position and views. Too bad. Talking about insecurity. That's the only "more of the same" going on here.
    - lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 8mo ago
      > Who here has said anything of substance in response to anything I've said? What have you written that is substantive? It appears your comments in this thread are all meta descriptions of themselves. That is what I refer to as a "psychological projection".
      - BuckRogers 8mo ago
        I said more of substance here than you for sure. At least I had a point. You’re just attacking the messenger. Totally useless.
        lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 8mo ago
        > I said more of substance here than you for sure. At least I had a point. Your comments do not make any substantive points. One observation with regard to this is that, when asked for anything you've written in this thread that is substantive, you write only that it exists rather than offering said substance for review. > You’re just attacking the messenger. My comments are not about you but instead about the things you've posted and your seeming behavior while doing so. I have no quarrel with you.
        BuckRogers 8mo ago
        Wow, talk about projecting.