7 ms·

shot and killed - they haven't even been charged, let alone arraigned for murder yet (they would definitely get not guilty for that - manslaughter at worst give

shot and killed - they haven't even been charged, let alone arraigned for murder yet (they would definitely get not guilty for that - manslaughter at worst given the cirumstances).

mindslight 8mo ago
Yes, our justice system is outright broken since the Supreme Council handed obscene amounts of power to a wannabe dictator, putting him and his Stasi above the law. But that doesn't mean We The People cannot call it like it is - murder.
fgfarben 8mo ago
They will 100% be charged with murder.
- websiteapi 8mo ago
  they can be charged with anything, but there's no way this guy is convicted of murder. anyone who thinks otherwise hasn't been paying attention to the hundreds of analogous situations that have been happening to blacks. literally just look it up, the exact scenario has already played out before. cop gets off. and I mean literally exact scenario - with two cops, one in front, one to the side, driver (black) tries to drive off, front cop shoots and kills the black guy, is convicted, and acquitted. seriously, look it up. George Zimmerman stalked Treyvon Martin, shot and killed him and was still acquitted. you think this guy is going to be convicted really?
  - jcranmer 8mo ago
    Derek Chauvin was convicted of murdering George Floyd, which was a decade after the George Zimmerman/Treyvon Martin case. I wouldn't put the chance of a conviction here at 100%, but it's certainly well above 0%.
    - websiteapi 8mo ago
      ? the chauvin case wasn't the same at all. he choked flyod needlessly for 10 minutes. completely unnecessary and good that chauvin was convicted. I follow these cases since I'm part of a police justice group - I've never seen a case similar to what happened here where the officer was convicted. there's just too much precedent that if a car is going towards you the officer is justified in shooting if you have an example of a similar situation where the cop is convicted I am very very interested.
- chimmych0nga 8mo ago
  [flagged]
  - deleted 8mo ago
    [deleted]
  - lanfeust6 8mo ago
    Trying to stop a moving vehicle by standing in front of it is a) dumb, b) not what law enforcement is trained to do. It will be argued that it's not the case the officer had no better choice.

shot and killed - they haven't even been charged, let alone arraigned for murder yet (they would definitely get not guilty for that - manslaughter at worst given the cirumstances).

mindslight 8mo ago

Yes, our justice system is outright broken since the Supreme Council handed obscene amounts of power to a wannabe dictator, putting him and his Stasi above the law. But that doesn't mean We The People cannot call it like it is - murder.

fgfarben 8mo ago

They will 100% be charged with murder.

websiteapi 8mo ago
they can be charged with anything, but there's no way this guy is convicted of murder. anyone who thinks otherwise hasn't been paying attention to the hundreds of analogous situations that have been happening to blacks. literally just look it up, the exact scenario has already played out before. cop gets off. and I mean literally exact scenario - with two cops, one in front, one to the side, driver (black) tries to drive off, front cop shoots and kills the black guy, is convicted, and acquitted. seriously, look it up. George Zimmerman stalked Treyvon Martin, shot and killed him and was still acquitted. you think this guy is going to be convicted really?
- jcranmer 8mo ago
  Derek Chauvin was convicted of murdering George Floyd, which was a decade after the George Zimmerman/Treyvon Martin case. I wouldn't put the chance of a conviction here at 100%, but it's certainly well above 0%.
  - websiteapi 8mo ago
    ? the chauvin case wasn't the same at all. he choked flyod needlessly for 10 minutes. completely unnecessary and good that chauvin was convicted. I follow these cases since I'm part of a police justice group - I've never seen a case similar to what happened here where the officer was convicted. there's just too much precedent that if a car is going towards you the officer is justified in shooting if you have an example of a similar situation where the cop is convicted I am very very interested.
chimmych0nga 8mo ago
[flagged]
- deleted 8mo ago
  [deleted]
- lanfeust6 8mo ago
  Trying to stop a moving vehicle by standing in front of it is a) dumb, b) not what law enforcement is trained to do. It will be argued that it's not the case the officer had no better choice.