11 ms·

If they tailwind, it sets a precedent for others. They can't pay everyone.

• dafelst 8mo ago
  So you're saying that just because they can't pay everyone, they should pay no one?
  • quaintdev 8mo ago
    Yeah I know how that sounds but it's the most logical explanation.
    • philipwhiuk 8mo ago
      Alternatively, they don't have a viable business model? This isn't rocket science. If your business can't exist within the law, it doesn't get to exist.
      • wiseowise 8mo ago
        There’s no law that says you have to pay businesses because you make customers life easier. If ChatGPT answers a law question for you that you’d have to ask an expensive lawyer, are they supposed to pay the lawyer too?
      • taormina 8mo ago
        Tell Uber you said hi.