5 ms·

I did this repair and it was not nearly as easy as you imply. The wire is extremely thin, and the pad on the motherboard is extremely small. I had to purchase s

I did this repair and it was not nearly as easy as you imply. The wire is extremely thin, and the pad on the motherboard is extremely small. I had to purchase special eye-wear in order to see what I was doing, in addition to a soldering iron. It was and is totally wrong that Framework requires users to repair a component that was faulty from the factory. You should ship the laptops back to your facility and repair them, at your expense. At worst, offer a substantial discount on a motherboard replacement. This experience is a big reason why I went from a strong Framework proponent to a strong detractor. You do not support your products, and users cannot trust you to do the right thing. You now bask in the idealistic haze of nerddom but your actions show that you're just a business for whom repairability is a sales strategy to justify premium prices.

sowbug 9mo ago
The warranty suggests that Framework would "ship the laptops back to [their] facility and repair them, at [their] expense," as you said they should. Did that not happen while your warranty period was in effect? https://frame.work/warranty https://frame.work/warranty
- simpaticoder 9mo ago
  No, it did not. And you had one of their representatives in this thread verify that fact. They expected you to do the repair with a soldering iron.
  - sowbug 9mo ago
    My question was about what happened during your warranty period. nrp's response was independent of warranty obligations.
    - rwbt 9mo ago
      They just offered free batteries.
    - simpaticoder 9mo ago
      The issue did not arise until after the warranty period expired. The manufacturing flaw drained the real-time clock battery which lasted about a year. Their first fix was to send a new battery; the second fix was a soldering job. I am not a lawyer, but this does not seem like it is legal. The manufacturing flaw was present from the beginning but was masked by the battery's charge.
- rwbt 9mo ago
  Nope. I don't think they even recognized the defect till many years later (probably for legal reasons?). For users, that were still under warranty - they offered free RTC batteries (which also stopped working later). Either way, I won't buy anything from them going forward.

sowbug 9mo ago

The warranty suggests that Framework would "ship the laptops back to [their] facility and repair them, at [their] expense," as you said they should. Did that not happen while your warranty period was in effect? https://frame.work/warranty https://frame.work/warranty

simpaticoder 9mo ago
No, it did not. And you had one of their representatives in this thread verify that fact. They expected you to do the repair with a soldering iron.
- sowbug 9mo ago
  My question was about what happened during your warranty period. nrp's response was independent of warranty obligations.
  - rwbt 9mo ago
    They just offered free batteries.
  - simpaticoder 9mo ago
    The issue did not arise until after the warranty period expired. The manufacturing flaw drained the real-time clock battery which lasted about a year. Their first fix was to send a new battery; the second fix was a soldering job. I am not a lawyer, but this does not seem like it is legal. The manufacturing flaw was present from the beginning but was masked by the battery's charge.
rwbt 9mo ago
Nope. I don't think they even recognized the defect till many years later (probably for legal reasons?). For users, that were still under warranty - they offered free RTC batteries (which also stopped working later). Either way, I won't buy anything from them going forward.