> They are merely useful abstractions Why are things which are useful and abstract of lesser value than things which are non-useful or non-abstract? Can you gi

> They are merely useful abstractions Why are things which are useful and abstract of lesser value than things which are non-useful or non-abstract? Can you give an example of a non-abstraction using your definition of abstraction? > a lot of things in society don't actually exist For what reasons should someone accept your personal ontology regarding what exists and what doesn't exist as the objectively correct one?