11 ms·

I like the inclusion of the graph at the end to compare progress. It would be cool to compare this directly to competing models (Claude, GPT, etc).

• kqr 9mo ago
  It would unfortunately also need several runs of each to be reliable. There's nothing in TFA to indicate the results shown aren't to a large degree affected by random chance! (I do think from personal benchmarks that Gemini 3 is better for the reasons stated by the author, but a single run from each is not strong evidence.)
  • casey2 9mo ago
    TFA says multiple times that the results are affect by random chance
    • kqr 9mo ago
      Yes, but recognising that is only the first step. Quantifying the variance is the next step which I miss in the article.