8 ms·
I was able to find the references (including photos of the mentioned forearms) on PubMed and the RIMJ after a quick search. Paraquat is nasty stuff. - [0] http
by desro 9mo ago
I was able to find the references (including photos of the mentioned forearms) on PubMed and the RIMJ after a quick search. Paraquat is nasty stuff.
- [0] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33769492/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33769492/
- [1] http://www.rimed.org/rimedicaljournal/2023/06/2023-06-40-images-castaneda-guarderas.pdf http://www.rimed.org/rimedicaljournal/2023/06/2023-06-40-ima... (via https://rimedicalsociety.org/rhode-island-medical-journal/ https://rimedicalsociety.org/rhode-island-medical-journal/)
- [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraquat https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraquat
- jtrn 9mo agoYeah, I found it myself. And yes, it's nasty stuff. But in the context of the article, it’s pure nonsense. Should we ban anhydrous ammonia, chlorine, or gasoline? They are nasty and dangerous too. The article is purely scare-mongering to make it seem true while obviously pushing an agenda. This is not science. See my reply at the same level after I did a review.
- stogot 9mo agoHow did his urethra not burn off? I can’t believe I’m typing this question