5 ms·
return in_reverse? (right > left) - (right < left) : (left > right) - (left < right); I prefer (with "greater" being ±1, defaulting to +1):
by CerryuDu 9mo ago
return in_reverse?
(right > left) - (right < left)
: (left > right) - (left < right);
I prefer (with "greater" being ±1, defaulting to +1):
return left < right ? -greater :
left > right ? greater :
0;