7 ms·
> Even if the conclusion is broadly correct, that doesn't mean the reasoning used to get there is consistent. This is the conclusion of a reply that focused en
by johnecheck 9mo ago
> Even if the conclusion is broadly correct, that doesn't mean the reasoning used to get there is consistent.
This is the conclusion of a reply that focused entirely on critiquing OP's style/AI use instead of their reasoning? Ironic.
- throw234678 9mo agoPoe's Law strikes again!
- ip26 9mo agoIf someone generates a ten thousand word slop essay with AI, do I have a moral obligation to critique its reasoning step by step instead of merely pointing out its origin? If I do, it just so happens I have a ten thousand word rebuttal for you…
- johnecheck 9mo agoIf someone generates a massive essay with AI, you don't have a moral obligation to do anything. If you want to argue that the reasoning in the essay is incorrect, I do expect you to refute the reasoning instead of merely attacking the source.