5 ms·
Gnome has stagnated significantly.
by EarthIsHome 10mo ago
Gnome has stagnated significantly.
- tannhaeuser 10mo agoIf only it had stagnated around gnome 2.0.
- tristan957 9mo agoMATE exists. You can use it right now.
- nextaccountic 9mo agoI do. It's great that the UI is stagnated, but unfortunately the UX is too. Things like bluetooth not being integrated with the DE, and various details that we take for granted not working correctly
- throw10920 10mo agoCould that be due to increased popularity of KDE?
- phkahler 10mo ago>> Gnome has stagnated significantly. GTK is still alive. It seems like Cosmic desktop with GTK apps will be a reasonable path forward. Of course there's KDE and QT, but I mean as an alternative to those.
- spookie 9mo agoCosmic isn't there yet. I don't use GNOME but at least it works.
- shrubble 10mo agoThe Gnome desktop that shipped with Solaris over two decades ago is just as useful, possibly more useful, as the tablet-oriented hamburger menu UI of today. Yes, two decades: https://adtmag.com/articles/2003/08/04/solaris-gets-a-gnome-of-its-own.aspx https://adtmag.com/articles/2003/08/04/solaris-gets-a-gnome-...
- JeremyNT 10mo agoI'm not sure this is bad? It's still maintained, and it isn't like there are frequent revolutions in UI design - if it works, it works. Slow and boring is a pretty nice place to be.
- maxloh 9mo agoIt doesn't really work for me. The first thing I always do with it is installing a taskbar extension.
- jamespo 10mo agoLinux on the desktop isn't a lucrative business
- aprilnya 9mo agoHas it? I feel like Gnome has made great progress the last few years
- tristan957 9mo agoThe people on the Red Hat desktop team that work on GNOME are killing it. I think you might not be paying attention. Not every change is visible.