8 ms·
I question whether the original death here would have been tracked as rabies Vs heart attack. Which also suggests perhaps it is slightly more common than data
by ErrantX 10mo ago
I question whether the original death here would have been tracked as rabies Vs heart attack.
Which also suggests perhaps it is slightly more common than data suggests
- toast0 10mo agoFrom the CDC report [1], it's pretty clear that rabies was not considered for the donor until after the donee died and rabies was confirmed. Possibly because the donor had been scratched by a skunk and not biten. The report says the scratch had been noted on the donor risk assessment interview (DRAI), but that skunks are not considered a reservoir for rabies in his area. [1] https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/74/wr/mm7439a1.htm https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/74/wr/mm7439a1.htm
- thaumasiotes 9mo agoSkunks also aren't aggressive... I thought rabies had to be considered for any interaction with a wild animal. For one showing atypical behavior, the indication is that much stronger.