5 ms·
Their argument is that ln(z) where z is a complex number is a multi-valued function, so the statement "Explore why i^i is real number" could be misinterpreted a
by xinu2020 10mo ago
Their argument is that ln(z) where z is a complex number is a multi-valued function, so the statement "Explore why i^i is real number" could be misinterpreted as i^i = a single well-defined real value.
- JohnKemeny 10mo agoYes, but it seems strange to claim that i^i isn't anything. That just completely ignores what's interesting, namely that i(π/2 + 2πk) is real for all k ∈ Z.
- deleted 10mo ago[deleted]
- ogogmad 10mo agoIn maths, an expression only ever equals a single number. You can't say i^i = e^(-pi/2) and then also say that i^i = e^(3 pi / 2), because if i^i equals two things, then those two things are also equal to each other, and then we get that e^(-pi/2) = e^(3 pi / 2), which is wrong. Riemann surfaces are the only way to fix this. And they're not even that hard to understand, but I'm not sure if you do. Stop making people confused.
- ogogmad 10mo agoApologies if this is pedantic but "multi-valued function" is not a thing. The function doesn't have multiple values here. Saying "multi-valued function" is not just a way of misleading people about what's really happening, but it's almost the perfect way to stop people from finding out. Do people who say "multi-valued function" know what's really happening? Do you know what a Riemann surface is?