5 ms·
Indeed, facts are part of the moral discussion in ways you outlined. My objection was that just listing some facts/opinions about what AI can do right now is no
by ttiurani 10mo ago
Indeed, facts are part of the moral discussion in ways you outlined. My objection was that just listing some facts/opinions about what AI can do right now is not enough for that discussion.
I wanted to make this point here explicitly because lately I've seen this complete erasure of the moral dimension from AI and tech, and to me that's a very scary development.
- p2detar 10mo ago> because lately I've seen this complete erasure of the moral dimension from AI and tech, and to me that's a very scary development. But that is exactly what the "is ought problem" manifests, or? If morals are "oughts", then oughts are goal-dependent, i.e. they depend on personally-defined goals. To you it's scary, to others it is the way it should be.
- crabmusket 10mo agoGet with the program dude. Where we're going, we don't need morals.