7 ms·

Why would AGI not be possible? It might be hard, it might be difficult, but it is definitely possible. Us humans are the evidence for that.

• gampleman 10mo ago
  That’s rather presupposing materialism (in the philosophy of mind sense) is correct. That seems to be the consensus theory, but it’s not be shown ‘definitely’ true.
• torginus 10mo ago
  Because human brains are giant three-dimensional processors containing billions of neurons (each with computationally complex behaviors), each one performing computations >3 orders of magnitude more efficiently than transistors do, to train an intelligence with trillions of connections in real time, while being attached to incredibly sophisticated sensors and manipulators. And despite all that, humans are still just made of dirt. Even if we can get silicon to do some of these tricks, that'd require multiple breakthroughs, and it wouldn't be cost-competitive with humans for quite a while. I would even think it's possible that building brain-equivalent structures that consume the same power, and can do all the stuff for the same amount of resources, is a so far out science fiction proposition, that we can't even give a prediction as to when it will happen, and for practical purposes, biological intelligences will have an insurmountable advantage for even the furthest foreseeable future once you consider the economics of humans vs machines.
  • rightbyte 10mo ago
    > And despite all that, humans are still just made of dirt. No we become dirt. I guess we are made of wood and computers are made of sand.
    • robotresearcher 10mo ago
      We are made of meat.
      • rightbyte 10mo ago
        Ye I was alluding to carbon and silicon.
• habinero 10mo ago
  Theoretically possible doesn't mean we're capable of doing it. Like, it's easy to say "I'm gonna boil the ocean" and another thing for you personally to succeed at it while on a specific beach with the contents of several Home Depots. Humans tend to vastly underestimate scale and complexity.