5 ms·
Without being there, I can't be sure, but the way the OP describes this appears to miss the point. The way I interpret that sentence, using the very little con
by funkwyrm 14y ago
Without being there, I can't be sure, but the way the OP describes this appears to miss the point.
The way I interpret that sentence, using the very little context supplied, is
profits,
people,
and sex
yaknow, sex with women, men, whatever
remember that song from the 90s opp = other people's "privates | p | p" or whatever you want "P" to stand for.
Without more context, that's exactly what I get from that, nothing anti-women whatsoever.
- wonderzombie 14y agoAnd I guess as a guy, you're eminently qualified to determine what is and isn't insulting to women?
- wonderzombie 14y agoDownvotes? Ha! It's true, though, isn't it? I mean, is a Java developer qualified to critique a reasonably large C++ application? Not really, no. You can try, but there are idioms, pitfalls, and such that you just won't pick up on. So why do we tolerate the same behavior when it comes to men's experiences vs. women's experiences? This isn't all that complicated. You didn't live the last N years of your life as a woman. You can try to reason about it. Maybe you'll come close. But you just don't have the experience.