7 ms·
This is consistent with photo licensing, which is often scaled based on the potential number of viewers for both print and digital.
by thelogicguy 10mo ago
This is consistent with photo licensing, which is often scaled based on the potential number of viewers for both print and digital.
- lol768 10mo ago> This is consistent with photo licensing On the contrary, I would say this is increasingly unusual nowadays. There are print restrictions on e.g. iStock content, but there's no attempt to "ration" the number of visitors that see a stock photo at a specific price point. It's something that's generally put me off from licensing paid fonts - despite the work that has gone into them, because you're almost signing a blank cheque and it's not easy to know how many visitors are scraping content for LLMs.