5 ms·
#creative I like this idea, but the results have what I would say is "very low momentum" in them (not speaking with any kind of terminology here, just ad hoc)
by its_so_on 14y ago
#creative
I like this idea, but the results have what I would say is "very low momentum" in them (not speaking with any kind of terminology here, just ad hoc) meaning that just as when you write L E T T E R S e..x..t..r..e...m...e...l...y... s--l---o---w---l---y you get much more wiggle in them, the two images on this page are very very wavy, as though the pen that drew them had no momentum.
isn't there a way to have lines be drawn by a hand that has inertia/momentum and is trying to follow the logical curve, but just wavers a certain percentage and correct as it goes along? This is what gets (in my opinion) the result we see. Someone drawing at a good pace by hand and correcting while he does so. not a "random deviation" around the logical path, whch is what these results seem to be more like.
- esrauch 14y agoWhy do you put #creative on every comment?
- its_so_on 14y agoonly a few, as i explain in one of them. some of my other comments if they are extremely technical and analytical might instead contain a rational tag :)
- icebraining 14y agoHave you considered using two accounts instead?
- its_so_on 14y agoI won't use two accounts because I'm a uniter, not a divider. I'd like each side to pay a lot of attention to the other, and I think they're wrong (actually worse than wrong) not to. The rational is worse than wrong not to pay more attention to the creative, and the creative is worse than wrong not to pay more attention to the rational.
- its_so_on 14y agoJust a note that a lot of people find my tagging annoying. I will think of another solution.