9 ms·
Do you need a CDN for a static html, no images? I would guess no, even if you.are being bombarded with requests
by carstenhag 10mo ago
Do you need a CDN for a static html, no images? I would guess no, even if you.are being bombarded with requests
- ZeroConcerns 10mo agoI would guess yes, unless you have a server with unlimited file descriptors and flawless connectivity to every other AS...
- amelius 10mo agoBut CDNs are made for static content so your comment means I can't run a dynamic website unless I have unlimited file descriptors and flawless connectivity.
- benregenspan 10mo ago"Need" is a strong word. But I think the point is that if you expect wildly spikey traffic/don't want the site to go down if it receives a very sudden influx of requests, going static is a very good answer, much cheaper than "serverless" or over-provisioning.