6 ms·
You could also create a network for each pair of containers that need to communicate with one another.
by brirec 10mo ago
You could also create a network for each pair of containers that need to communicate with one another.
- HumanOstrich 10mo agoThat would create an excessive amount of bridges in my case. Also this is another trivial suggestion that anyone can find with a quick search or asking an LLM. Not helpful. I'm not sure why people are replying to my comment with solutioning and trivial suggestions. All I did was encourage the thread OP to publish their notes. FWIW I've already been through a lot of options for solving my issue, and I've settled on one for now.
- kortilla 10mo ago> I'm not sure why people are replying to my comment with solutioning and trivial suggestions Because your comment didn’t say you solved it and you asked for notes without any polish as if that would help.
- HumanOstrich 10mo agoI didn't say I settled on a solution for all time. I said "for now". I'm still interested in alternatives.
- marginalia_nu 10mo agoIf you want point-to-point communication between two network namespaces, you should use veths[1]. I think virtual patch cables is a good mental model for veths. If you want multiple participants, you use bridges, which are roughly analogous to switches. [1] https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man4/veth.4.html https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man4/veth.4.html