5 ms·
MongoDB Atlas was around 500% more expensive than in-house every time I evaluated it (at almost every scale they offer as well). They also leaned too heavily o
by bmcahren 10mo ago
MongoDB Atlas was around 500% more expensive than in-house every time I evaluated it (at almost every scale they offer as well).
They also leaned too heavily on sharding as a universal solution to scaling as opposed to leveraging the minimal cost of terabytes of RAM. The p99 latency increase, risk of major re-sharding downtime, increased restore times, and increased operational complexity weren't worth it for ~1 TB datasets.
- winrid 10mo agoThat's because sharding is way more likely to make them more money with their licensing model.