6 ms·
Reminds me of this comment on the Dropbox HN launch thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9224 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9224 There are may b
by sai18 10mo ago
Reminds me of this comment on the Dropbox HN launch thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9224 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9224
There are may be other general-purpose tools out there that overlap in some ways, but our focus is on vertically specializing in the mainframe ecosystem and building AI-native tooling specifically for the problems in this space.
- cess11 10mo agoI'm not sure what "AI-native" would mean but GT has LLM-integrations, support for working in distributed systems and a COBOL-bridge that has been used in managing transitions of legacy systems. Here's a talk about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8TSPED0alY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8TSPED0alY If you load the code referenced here, https://book.gtoolkit.com/analyzing-cobol--the-aws-carddemo-case-stu-ddxd4pjfjsjbx0elhfaetwhkw https://book.gtoolkit.com/analyzing-cobol--the-aws-carddemo-... , you can explore the demo used in the talk. I'm sure you'll manage to figure out the LLM-integrations. Edit: The Feenk folks also have a structured theory for why and how to do these things that they've spent a lot of time and experience on refining, visualising and developing tooling around. I think it is a good idea for anyone working with large legacy systems to have such a theoretical foundation for how to communicate, approach problems and evaluate progress. Without it one is highly likely to make expensive decisions based on gut feeling and vague assumptions.