9 ms·

N/A

• _puk 11mo ago
  Edit: Parent has edited out the comment ranting about "the normal people using chatGPT as a modern WebMD". This is not shutting anything down other than businesses using ChatGPT to give medical advice [0]. Users can still ask questions, get answers, but the terms have been made clearer around reuse of that response (you cannot claim that it is medical advice). I imagine that a startup that specialises in "medical advice" infers an even greater level of trust than simply asking ChatGPT, especially to "the normal people". 0: https://lifehacker.com/tech/chatgpt-can-still-give-legal-and-health-advice https://lifehacker.com/tech/chatgpt-can-still-give-legal-and...
  • ankit219 11mo ago
    The thing is that if you are giving professional advice in US - legal, financial, medical - the other party can sue you for wrong or misleading advice. In that scenario, this leaves Openai exposed to a lawsuit, and this change seemingly eliminates that.
    • _puk 11mo ago
      Yeah, that clearly makes sense from OpenAI's perspective.
    • ares623 11mo ago
      Would be amazing if they prefix everything with “this is not financial advice. Do your own research. “