5 ms·
All western economies are socialist nowadays. There doesn't exist any hyper-capitalistic economies. What hyper-capitalistic economies are you talking about? Ev
by personomas 11mo ago
All western economies are socialist nowadays. There doesn't exist any hyper-capitalistic economies. What hyper-capitalistic economies are you talking about?
Even America has become a socialist country. The current Republicans are doing their best (thankfully) to slowly roll this back, but it's a long, slow process.
As evidence that America has become a socialist country, you just need to look at the massive expansion of medicare/medicaid and social security.
Here is a great place to start (Scroll down to the table called "Historical Social Security Tax Rates" and see how the numbers have just exploded): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Security_(United_States) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Security_(United_States...
- whou 11mo ago> All western economies are socialist nowadays. There doesn't exist any hyper-capitalistic economies. What hyper-capitalistic economies are you talking about? What? How are any of "western economies" socialist AT ALL?? Do the workers on "all western economies" own the means of production in any way, shape, or form?
- personomas 11mo agoSocialism = lots of social welfare You sound like an ignorant american. Germany prides itself on being a socialist state. It's even anchored in their constitution (Article 20): "Germany is a democratic and socialist state." Lots of other european countries are similar in this regard to Germany. The word socialism is well integrated in almost all european countries except for the english speaking ones. Most European countries consider themselves to be socialist states. > Do the workers on "all western economies" own the means of production in any way, shape, or form? You're drawing from some sort of book definition, like an ignorant american. You don't understand what "socialism" means.
- hnusersarelame 11mo ago[dead]
- rcbdev 11mo agoIf America has a socialist economy, Central Europe must be full-scale marxist-communist in your eyes.
- personomas 11mo agoCentral Europe is far more socialist. They're legitimately becoming communist. For example, in Germany, the socialist/left/green pretty dominate and control almost all power here. Democracy is one of the few last standing barricades to germany becoming a full-blown communist state. Yet, even democracy is starting to fade here. Besides Germany, most of europe is well grounded in democracy. Therefore, I wouldn't call most of european countries communist states. However, once socialism reaches a certain point, societies start to fail, and economies start to stagnate or even go backwards. We are starting to witness this here in European. Stagnating or retreading economies. Germany's economy hasn't grown in years.
- locallost 11mo agoSocialism means society owns the means of production with the goal of having more equality. Obviously not the case in America. Why is Medicare proof of the US being a socialist country and not the existence of e.g. the US Army? The former is a formal agreement of the majority to spend money on citizens' health, the latter a formal agreement to spend money on citizens' protection from invasion by a foreign country. Obviously everyone agrees an army is needed, so why not health care?
- personomas 11mo agoIt looks like you're an American who has no idea what socialism even is and you had to look up on the internet. Let me break it down for you in a simple manner: Socialism = lots of social welfare Therefore, the continual dramatic expansion of Social Welfare (especially for the old) means america has become a shitty social state.
- locallost 11mo agoActually I was born and lived the first years of my life in a communist country. America I have visited once for about a week. Why is spending money on people's health social welfare, and spending money on their safety not social welfare, whether it's financing the army, police, fire department? Should it not be the responsibility of each individual to protect their life, family, home etc. from danger? Why should these dangers and the protection from them be SOCIALIZED? I for one am perfectly capable of protecting my property of fire, if someone is not, well it's their problem.
- aids_bomb 11mo ago[dead]
- personomas 11mo agoYou seem to be very lost, @locallost. Great name. Certain services are obviously best done from a collective, society standpoint. You wouldn't be able to protect your property from certain wild fires, like what happened California. Nor protect yourself from an invasion from another country. Nor break up a criminal gangster mob that attacks the people.