7 ms·
So the first scenario is also basically “automatic scanner bypass”? That answers my question, yes. > making a tar file that when inspected looks fine Am I cor
by goldsteinq 11mo ago
So the first scenario is also basically “automatic scanner bypass”? That answers my question, yes.
> making a tar file that when inspected looks fine
Am I correct in understanding that manual inspection would reveal a nested .tar archive (so recursive inspection of nested archives should be enough)?
- denhamparry 11mo agoIt is possible to exploit this bug by crafting a file that has tar contents without a header, thus making it hard to detect even with recursive archives.