5 ms·
> The one thing I never understood about these warnings is how they don't run afoul of libel laws. I’m not a lawyer, but this hasn’t ever been taken to court,
by pasteldream 11mo ago
> The one thing I never understood about these warnings is how they don't run afoul of libel laws.
I’m not a lawyer, but this hasn’t ever been taken to court, has it? It might qualify as libel.
- altairprime 11mo agoI know of no such cases, and would love to know if someone finds one.
- trenchpilgrim 11mo agoI worked for a company who had this happen to an internal development domain, not exposed to the public internet. (We were doing security research on our own software, so we had a pentest payload hosted on one of those domains as part of a reproduction case for a vulnerability we were developing a fix for.) Our lawyers spoke to Google's lawyers privately, and our domains got added to a whitelist at Google.
- modzu 11mo agoyou only sue somebody poorer than you
- tgsovlerkhgsel 11mo agoIt depends, if it's a clear-cut case, then in jurisdictions with a functioning legal system it can be feasible to sue. Likewise, if it's a fuckup that just needs to be put in front of someone who cares, a lawsuit is actually a surprisingly effective way of doing that. This moves your problem from "annoying customer support interaction that's best dealt with by stonewalling" into "legal says we HAVE to fix this".